Order of the order magistrate, CR PC, disagreeing with the order on the investigation officer's report under Section 365/109 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Sections 1969, 173 (3) and 561A Section 173 (3). And, however, the magistrate was obliged to consider all the material collected during the investigation and then pass a fair, fair and speaking order if the investigating officer was not properly investigated and the accused Submitted that under the influence of the magistrate, the magistrate also could not agree, but the dissent should have reflected the reasons for the order under which he made the order. Faith, the defendant, the complainant, and his witnesses were called. With the order of the Investigating Officer, the Magistrate was ordered to record the statement of the deceased by reviewing the same date without giving any reason for disagreeing with the order of the Magistrate, thereby directing the Magistrate to investigate. In accordance with the law, consider all material prepared with the officer's final report and then, if necessary, pass the first decisive and speaking order. , Considering the complainant's request to record the abduction statement under Section 160, CR PC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
