Find a Lawyer

ENGLISH BISCUIT MANUFACTURES (PVT.) LIMITED versus MONOPOLY CONTROL AUTHORITY

Sections 3, 11, 12, 14, 19 and 20 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal of High Court Retention Special Inquiries, Refusal of Showcase Notices to be filed by less than 25 persons The Monopoly Control Authority dismissed on the ground that the applicant was not a provocateur. Showcases notices issued by the Monopoly Control Authority to the respondents were withdrawn and proceedings dismissed, the petition filed by the petitioner was also dismissed. Court excludes, not moderate person, monopoly and compulsory trading practices (control and prevention) The ordinance, aggravated by an order under section 11 or 19 of 1970, had the right to appeal under section 20 of the ordinance order passed by the Monopoly Control Authority, but was not an order under section 11 or 19 ? Business practices related to monopolies and sanctions (control and prevention) Ordinance, 1970, but there was an order under Section 14 of the Ordinance, against which no appeal could be entertained under Article 20 of the Ordinance. Is not, by the order of the Authority, nor has the High Court's decision suffered any illegal interference, injustice or grave misconduct, nor has it been misinterpreted or misinterpreted by any of the sections / sections. Have encountered Monopolies and Restricted Trade Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970 The High Court justified in admitting that the complaint filed by the applicant was not intact as it had to comply with Section 14 (2) of the monopoly. Was not filed or submitted by the required number of persons required under 25. And binding how to become a advocate from Mailsi lawyer