Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MESSRS DAWOOD COTTON MILLS LTD versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL


Section (37 ()) and Constitution 38 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The question was whether the respondents were employees or contractors based on the material available on record, the Labor Appellate Tribunal, recorded that the defendants. The employees were such an inquiry by the employer, which the High Court affirmed, which practiced to present the evidence along with relevant provisions of the law presented by the parties, as both courts found that the defendant was the employer's employer. Employed and not a contractor. Their employer; confessing that the decision was irrelevant will acknowledge the interference of the Supreme Court in the process of jurisdiction under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.