Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MESSRS DAWOOD COTTON MILLS LTD versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL


Section (37 ()) and Constitution 38 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The question was whether the respondents were employees or contractors based on the material available on record, the Labor Appellate Tribunal, recorded that the defendants. The employees were such an inquiry by the employer, which the High Court affirmed, which practiced to present the evidence along with relevant provisions of the law presented by the parties, as both courts found that the defendant was the employer's employer. Employed and not a contractor. Their employer; confessing that the decision was irrelevant will acknowledge the interference of the Supreme Court in the process of jurisdiction under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from New Saeedabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.