MEHMOOD SON OF BAHAWAL versus MEHMOOD SON OF SOINA
Para 19 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Article 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) asserts that the plaintiffs have been paid the price paid by the Land Reform authorities as a suit land allotment. In response to the question, the entries in Jamabandi are showing as the plaintiff. Its owner was illegal and invalid. The plaintiff's request was that he bequeathed the suit as his tenant upon payment of the installments, but the suit was rendered unanimous by all three courts based on the evidence of the record. There were also suits on the ground. The plaintiff was legally allotted after the declaratory resume. The plaintiff paid his dues and the change was affirmed in his favor. I was relying solely on the jurisdiction and the receipt of the payment by the defendant would not be sufficient to terminate him as the owner of the suit property. Such mischief was demonstrated by Deputy Land Commissioner Plaintiff's renaming of Father's Name in the Father's Name column to questions regarding Plaintiff's suit. Could not prove allotment. The Supreme Court rejected the demand for any intervention
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
