KHUDA BAKHSH AND OTHERS versus STATE
Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) accused, four real brothers, killed 13 people in the night, such an incident could not be disclosed and the culprit could not escape the unknown complainant The witness was an independent witness. There is no cause or ill will for the accused's malicious crime and his testimony is credible and reliable. The accused is no stranger to the complainant, his identity, even at night, is a problem for him. Could not produce, especially when the incident continued for a long time and the recovery and medical evidence of the blood-stained weapons and blood-stained clothing of the four accused also supported ocular testimony, alleging guilt. The accused had a legitimate purpose in which the accused killed his two mamas. The perpetrators of such offenses are deserving of their offspring, including children between the ages of 2 and 25 years. No interference is needed for the mercy sentence and the punishment of the accused. Accordingly, the leave of the accused was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer