CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 2265/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 11TH NOVEMBER, — list of lawyers in Tibba Sultanpur

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help

Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

Chat on WhatsApp — Free Or unlock 10 direct numbers for Rs 1,000

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 2265/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 11TH NOVEMBER, 2004. versus CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 2265/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 11TH NOVEMBER, 2004.

Sections 33 (1) and 26 general fines were imposed not to file returns because each applicant applying for registration had to file the sales tax return required under section 26 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 ? The person who was fined this month under the Sales Tax Act 1990 is that every registered person has to file a return. If there was no enterprise registered person, he was not obliged to file the return. To do Applicant cannot be punished in fixed form because he was not a registered person for a month for which he was fined.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

list of advocates from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 2265/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 11TH NOVEMBER, 2004. versus CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 2265/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 11TH NOVEMBER, 2004.

Find a Lawyer Near You