Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.3412/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005. versus I.T.A. NO.3412/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005.

Sections 156, 62 and 80 of the CBR Circular No. 1 (155) DTO 11/94, dated 28 5 1995 Circular No. 12 of the CBR, 30 of 1991 1991 199 Correction of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Such an appeal was filed under section 62, which was decided by the appellate authority before the appellate authority on the direction of revenue audit, under section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, where the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Under Section 80C, the assessment was completed and taxed. The first appellate authority set aside the order approved under section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, was processed by the Income Tax Panel on 1979 and after checking the account, an order was passed under Section 132/62 of the Ordinance. In which the assessment was made again, in 1979, according to the provisions made under section 80C of the Income Tax Ordinance, such order was again finalized by the first appellate authority, which contained a large number of its On the basis of skepticism in the pre-action proceedings, it was evident that the facts of the case had a very clear and unambiguous conclusion. Presented by Sawyer, who was not present at the time, it was not a mistake to file a declaration at all. That the proceedings initiated by the panel, along with the misappropriation of facts, were completely illegal and were dismissed by the appellate tribunal. \ r \ n law firms from Kamalia lawyer