APPEAL NO. S.T.A. 1495/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 15TH DECEMBER, 2004. versus APPEAL NO. S.T.A. 1495/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 15TH DECEMBER, 2004.
Sections 3, 6, 23, 33, 34, 37 (a) (b) and 2 (9) Taxes showcase notice for supply of cotton lint and sales tax payment Sales tax evasion without issue of sales tax invoice Cotton smoked and cotton seeds were released due to the appellant's failure to submit a written response to show cause notice and no one appeared at the hearing to defend the charges and demand additional taxes and penalties as well as sales tax. Was also enforced by the Adjudicating Officer, which is available on record to prove that the show cause notice was presented to the appellant where the decision was an ex parte position. Even the appeal based on the information they had received a great responsibility case for de novo consideration of the case was sent to aydjdytng Officer. Get opportunities to listen to relevant parties so that a fair and fair decision can be made.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer