DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, NAROWAL versus ANSAR PERVAIZ
Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) mandatory retirement respondents, who were appointed dispensers, were directed to formalize their services within 90 days, in which they would be considered a failure. ? Through departmental officials, he filed appeals before the service tribunal, which was partially allowed to make an improper decision under which his dismissal from his job was changed to mandatory retirement. Could not take advantage of functionality on the respective. Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution does not include any important question regarding the law of public importance because in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Film Service Tribunal decided to remove the respondents from the mandatory retirement penalty into a mandatory retirement. Had justified enough. And denied leave to appeal \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
