INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MIAN ASIM FAREED
Section 7 (4) of the Contempt of the Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 406 and 420 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR repealed and in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, on the taking of the discrimination injunction High Court, The FIR was revoked on the basis that it was registered in contravention of the provisions of Section 7 (4) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001. No order can be passed to terminate the FIR of validity, nor can it be approved that the crime is a crime. The FIR mentioned was false and malicious, and in the absence of any suggestion that a particular forum or format was made in connection with the confession of a crime, it also registered and took the FIR seriously. Related forbidden. There were two separate and independent concepts of cases under criminal law. If the lawmaker intended to prevent the registration of an FIR, then the legislature would be defeated. If there is a serious condition, then it can never be read to ban FIR registration. The High Court did not pass a legal and lawful order. And the order passed by the High Court of Appeal was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Phalia lawyer