Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD IQBAL versus STATE

Sections 4 324, 666, 7 337 D and 7 evidence7 F (iii) The incidents were appreciated during daylight and in connection with the alleged incident the FIR was promptly listed and the names of the accused and Specific roles were clearly listed in which the prosecution's witnesses were told. The prosecution witnesses were the victims of the case as the fact of their injuries was recorded and the defense failed to bring anything on the record to establish any illicit desire or bitterness among the victims. Was. The witnesses made permanent statements before the trial court and their statements had ample support from the medical evidence which was confirmed to confirm the date and time of the incident, the weapons used by the assailants. And those who were injured were sustained by these testimonies. In this case, the account was presented, alleging the recovery of a pistol inflicted by the accused during the investigation was legally inconsistent in the absence of any such pistol match with any crime, but the case has led to the accused. The prosecution did not undermine the prosecution, both the accused acknowledged their presence and participation in the incident, a different version of the same accused was produced, however, to establish or prove their stated version. ???? Defendant's version could not be presented independent evidence was also not proposed to the complainant before the trial court, even though the accused did not know No weapon was recovered from the wreckage, but the failure by the investigating officer, including the entire prosecutor advocates from Orakzai lawyer