MUHAMMAD IMRAN ALIAS MITHU versus STATE
Articles 2 (2 (b) / 4 34 and 4 324/3434) Definition of evidence, reduction of sentence, reduction of defense lawyer challenged the accused's death sentence on the basis that the eyewitnesses did not. It did not say whether either of them, the suspect or the accompanying suspect, had fired the fatal shot at the accused, and according to the record, his co-accused fired a bullet that killed the deceased child and The injured female witness was acquitted on the basis of a compromise, and at the same time, the injured woman suffered a fireworks injury, judicial conviction cannot be ascertained. Of the accused and the accompanying accomplices, the deceased was shot dead, with no enmity with the accused. Section 2302 (b), the offenders of the accused were sentenced under PPC, but Under her sentence, the death sentence was limited to life imprisonment while in the circumstances the injured woman witness declared herself an injection. On the charge of acquittal of the accused, therefore, the accused was acquitted under section 324. Gone, the PPC appeal was dealt with accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Risalpur lawyer