MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus ASRAR AHMAD KHAN
Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Fraudulent / Misrepresentation Limitation Under Section 12 (2), the decision of 25 6 1973 was transferred to 15 2 2000 After which more than 26 years were fully known to the applicants. The decision in question because he was participating in the post-remand proceedings before the notified officer and filed an unqualified appeal against the order of the Notified Officer dated 18 Not 1995, which was subject to the constitutional petition filed in 1996. Were not As disclosed in the petition under section 12 (2), the application did not provide remote reference to such essential aspects of the case, even when the applicants had to explain the long postponement involved in the post-remand proceedings. No attempt was made and only after this was filed against him, it cannot be said that he had no knowledge of the 25 6 1973 decision that the application was in fact beyond limits. The lion cannot be denied and cannot be allowed merely because there were allegations of fraud and so on. The door to the court cannot be knocked down at any time, the extent of which can be ignored and the statute of limitations cannot be ignored and rendered useless.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Dunyapur lawyer