Find a Lawyer

SHAMS-UD-DIN THROUGH L.RS. versus ABID HUSSAIN THROUGH L.RS.

Specific performance of the contract to sell section 12 law evidence (10 of 1984), arts 17 (2) (a), 78 and 79 stamp act (II of 1899), section 35, 40 and schedule I, CL5 contract Suit for a plain / ordinary paper without the thumb impression of the defendant or his ANC number on the plaintiff's testimony in the absence of a refusal to execute the contract and the author of the agreement in court Investigation was not only a legal obligation to prove the contract itself, but also to prove through the evidence that he had indeed entered into a sale transaction with the defendant and that in fact his contract Ayt which was sold to the plaintiff's case did not check the two witnesses, thus, the need to Arts 17 and 79 in the 1984 index. Failure to complete the contract, no witness can substitute for another witness who testifies that the controversial contract was written by a licensed person whose business will not be allowed to enter Was not trained. The application author's correspondent, who under the rules is required to enter a single register in his register and obtain the signature of his / her executor, is required by law to have a contract to sell for writing on illegal judicial stamp paper. The contract will not raise any legal costs, unless accelerated by the Collector. Defendants' signatures on the Article 40 written statement of the Stamp Act, 1899, and the signatories of the contentious agreement were not consistent with each other. advocates from Sheikhupura lawyer