Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus SAIF NADEEM ELECTRO (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN

For the Section 12 Gardens and Wards Act (VII of 1890), the Section 29 suit, one of the executors of the specific performance of the joint property sale agreement raised that when the sale agreements were executed, it was trivial. , So there were such agreements. What is wrong is that the defendants at the time were minors and were contracted by their real mother. In the agreement, it was specifically stipulated that the mother obtain a guardianship certificate and a permit from the Guardian Court before the target date for the sale of the minor portion in the joint estate. These documents were submitted by the defendants that the mother applied for permission from the Guardian Court and obtained permission under the plaintiff's question that an application was made to the Guardians Court for permission under Section 29, Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Was made under a contract of sale and this agreement was mentioned in the request and permission was sought and obtained on the same account, and that the intermediary was not involved Even the sale agreement was invalid, the present case, it was not trivial, which was a contract of self, Was through a guardianship, the seller's contract was not a real estate sale agreement, but the only promise to do so was in the future if the contract was made by a minor through a close relative, such as a mother and The primary fee was in the interest of the individual, as in the present case, because the other partner was selling his shares, and retaining his share of the common debt with the minor. immigration advocates email from Kunjah lawyer