MST. GUL NISSA AND ANOTHER versus MUHAMMAD YOUSUF
Section 2302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Review of the evidence The confessional statement of the grave and the sudden provocation double murder accused made the confessional statement by looking at his cousin and his family in the state of compromise. Had killed them. And on the basis of his confessional statement, the trial court sentenced him to death. High court commutes death sentence to life imprisonment Reading the statement of confession offense made it clear that the accused had admitted or admitted to a serious and abusive offense when the sole basis was laid. The sentence must be considered as a High Court justified the death sentence to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court had also reduced the sentence in such cases to five years. The High Court upheld the conviction of the offender from the death sentence to life imprisonment. The reasons and the same was in accordance with the law prescribed for the accused. Even though the prosecutor's evidence was rejected, his statement was quoted. The High Court had earlier reduced the death sentence to life imprisonment and the accused has been told Failure that the High Court refused to appeal the discretion as a miscarriage of justice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Mari Indus lawyer