Find a Lawyer

SYED FAKHAR IMAM SHAH versus ABDUL HAQ (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS.

Article 24 of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), AXX, R14 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 163 MLR 115, pre-emption in relation to land violation of the provisions of paragraph 24 The collector will not have any legal or moral justification to challenge the authenticity of such a sale, even though the seller and the seller agree to apply the informant (vendor employee) following the order of sale mutation by Furman district. The transaction will not be completely void even if certain provisions are violated. The pre-emptive right of pre-emptor MLR 115 could not be defeated solely on the basis that the sale of the land suffered a defect, before the impression derivative would not be considered a sale because it would not be considered by the court. It was enforced only by judgment and by any enforcement. Such request was not enforced by law pre-emptor, the district collector passed an improper order without issuing notice or giving the pre-emptor / decree holder a hearing, whose vesting rights Had to be badly affected. The informant did not violate paragraph 24 of the MRR 115, and no defect could be shown to the violator or the informant, whose conduct was not commendable. On one hand top civil advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer