Find a Lawyer

AMIN AND OTHERS versus HAFIZ GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Article 13 Convention on Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Withdrawal of Tenant Rule of Estoppel Applicable Controversial title Under the title Landlord and tenant relationship in the year 1960 The defendant was transferred, who? As a built-in super structure and tenants, the applicants had been receiving rent from the respondents until 1991, when the authorities declared this property an Iwakis Trust property, directing the cancellation of the permanent transfer order and the respondents. Paid the direct sale of property in favor of the tenants. As a result of the order to lease out the defendants and declare this property as property by the IQQ Trust Property Rent Controller, I started paying the rent to the IQV Trust Property Board that the tenants denied the landlord and tenant relationship. Was prevented from doing so. The rent controller maintained by the High Court was the ploy taken by the tenants to refuse the relationship only when the tenant was acquired and not when the landlord and tenant relationship moved permanently. In the case of omissions that resulted in the termination of the verification of the order, the question of title was not relevant. In the case of a dispute between two competing claimants for the property, the tenant had no concrete position to intervene and the proper court was to resolve the dispute, not only to include the defendant's property but also Based on the facts. The respondents that it was founded on, there was no justification for the tenants to deny the title of the landlord. property advocates from Neelam lawyer