Find a Lawyer

SAMI ULLAH versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE

RR 3 and 4 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) facilitating escape of police constable offender, requesting a criminal case against him / The dismissal of the constable's accusation was handed over to the police tribunal armed with a government vehicle for detention of the prisoners by the service tribunal confirming the constable's appeal. The applicant was a member of such a police party and had stopped the vehicle to facilitate the escape of the offender by a long excuse that he wanted the vehicle to avoid any untoward incident to the nearest police station. Could be taken so that the police party armed with sophisticated weapons was extremely negligent and acted in a very irresponsible manner and failed to perform its duties effectively and could be punished with a non-handcuffed offender. No one from the police party has escaped without the help of collective communion and convenience. The applicant's appeal from the criminal trial will not matter on the merits of the case, after a comprehensive investigation, not only was he found liable for negligence, but also because of his active involvement. And convenience was born. The convicted Supreme Court dismissed the plea and refused leave of appeal best law firm from Bat Khela lawyer