Find a Lawyer

RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJA GUL versus HYDERABAD CANTONMENT BOARD

Sections 25, 60, 61, 62, 63 and 200 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Parking Charges Applicants challenged that the Cantonment Board did not impose a tax toll or fees on parking vehicles for cantonment vehicles. And / or was imposed by a government agency without the proper legislative authority and since there was no provision to authorize the Cantonment Board to collect parking fees in the Cantonment Act, 1924, such Under the provisions of section 25 of the Cantonment Act, 1924, the Executive Officer Board of this Act shall, on behalf of the emergency Recently, some work was given the option of incurring certain costs, which would require immediate implementation to protect the public, but it was stated that the department executive officer was required to receive or increase fees. Authority, whether it is covered / proposed under section 200 of the Act mentioned under section 200 of the Cantonment Act 1924, the Cantonment Board was granted special powers to collect fees. Options that cannot be exercised by anyone, including the Executive Officer of the Board, are required to charge a parking fee by the Board Or Court declared illegal, null and void law firms from Kandhkot lawyer