Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SHAPPIRE TEXTILE MILLS, KARACHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, (REVENUE DIVISION), MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC AFFAI

Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 151 and O IX, R: 9 Constitutional Application, Reinstatement of Civil Procedure Leaches, Applicable Request for 1908 Constitutional Reinstatement, Request for Illegal Prosecution was dismissed. 5/2 Years later, the bridge dismissed by the applicants was that they had no knowledge of settling the petition, therefore, under the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the application was made under Article 199 of the Constitution. Was forced to reinstate. Subject to any law other than the Constitution and any provision of the Constitution, the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, and the Limitation Act, 1908, which seeks to limit or restrict the authority or jurisdiction of the High Court, the Constitution of 1908 does not control Can do. Or control the proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitutional Court, exercising its constitutional jurisdiction. In the absence of a fixed term for filing an application under Article 199 of the Constitution or interstate applications, the doctrine of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, in such proceedings, was the only rule preventing the trial court from ruling. That was elastic and negligent. The court was not entitled to extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction of the temporary court and was negligent in pursuing the petition and was not entitled to request arbitrary jurisdiction of the application of the court. [P 557] B law firms from Samundri lawyer