Find a Lawyer

GAHI ALIAS GADA HUSSAIN versus SHAMAN

Complaint against Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 47 and AXXIII, R3 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the execution of a decree that compromised the Article 42 Constitution, has referred to the Mukhtar. (Land) Revenue and District Officer (Revenue) in the suit to amend the record of rights as per the settlement agreement, but they denied the change and for that reason, it can be declared that the Mukhtarkar Refused to change the entry in this record. The rights in the name of the applicants / decree holders were illegal, illegal and illegal as per the agreement and both officers have been instructed to change the records in the name of the applicants / decree holders as per the agreement. ? Granted, if this decision came to an end with the declaration of the rights and obligations of the parties concerned, its implementation was tried, it was a decree of the parties in the present case, in the present case, the decree of the agreement. I, the terms and conditions of the agreement were set out and after the survey number and the description of the areas which each party had to agree on, it was agreed. When the record will be prepared according to the approval of the decree and the district attorney was the party to the settlement agreement, when there was a specific condition in the agreement and the agreement was made according to the terms and conditions set by the parties to the settlement. Was. The condition that the record be prepared accordingly, was not a decree of simplicity in nature and, therefore, if the arbitrators were parties to the decree of the settlement, the refusal to act according to the agreement. tax advocates from Mansehra lawyer