Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IKRAM versus AFTAB AHMAD KHAN

The trial court dismissed the trial filed by the plaintiff / pre-emptor under trial for framing of sections 6 and 13, but the appellate court accepted the appeal and decided the trial court's order and order. Name separated. The plaintiff / pre-emptor was reviewed under the judgment and order of the appellate court, which provided sufficient evidence to fulfill its obligation to the requisite demands and said that the evidence shows that all students Were made, but there were some discrepancies and the notice was processed. The errors and contradictions were minor in the statements of the witnesses presented by the plaintiff, which could not have been lost when the plaintiff failed to establish the basic requirement of the litigation and said that the contradictions were not so much the material sought against the judgment. Disputes related to compliance. The appellate court's decree below, because of its discharge, was dismissed. solicitors from Dhoun Kal lawyer