Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HABIB versus SARHAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Section 2 (XI), (xvii), (xxx), 46 and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section O13 Additional Complaint Dismissing of Related Jobs / Labor Status High The main complaint appealed to the High Court was that they were declared surplus and after the Labor Court Presiding Officer returned the appeals complaint to be submitted to the appropriate forum. Dismissed from employment without providing an opportunity for a hearing. Appellants did not fall under the definition of labor and the employers were not a commercial establishment. Justification / Applicants were performing manual work under the Development Authority, which manufactured plots and sold and provided services to industries located in the industrial estate. Was busy with activities. The general administration was not a servant or respondent authority related to public business, but was directly related to the administration of the headquarters of the said authority but to services provided by the authority concerned with commercial concerns. Each of the appeals was covered by the praises of the worker, and thus the Labor Court was the appropriate forum to submit their grievance requests. In order to dispel their complaints requests and decide on their eligibility, Labor was instructed to dissolve the petitions and decide on the merits as well, after giving the parties ample opportunity for a fair hearing. r \ n patent advocate from Loralai lawyer