Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus ARSHAD IQBAL

Section 115 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Sections 8, 42 and 54 amend the jurisdiction of the High Court scope suit to recover possession, declaration, permanent order and division by the following courts under the trial court and the appellate court. Was permanently rejected as well. Were consistent with the material on the record and did not appear to have provided any prejudice by the contents of the Tamalak document involved in the case, correctly interpreted by the courts below and They were praised, the courts below were properly caught in the factual dispute, the matter was settled. After the constant use of the threadbare approach and open-minded conclusions that such conclusions could not be bothered in a theoretical jurisdiction trial court, the appellate court discussed every aspect of the matter in detail. And no matter the scope of further consideration, the facts or facts about the law recorded by the court / competent court cannot be interfered with in the jurisdiction of the review, as long as the results which are judicial error , Was subjected to illegality or material irregularities, to the High Court's jurisdiction under Section 115 While the facts in the jurisdiction of the review interfere with the facts, the CPC was a very limited court in exercising its jurisdiction. Under section 115, the CPC can only interfere with the orders of the subordinate courts, which the lower courts deemed to have jurisdiction over which they are not barred. Or put them inside by law registration advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer