Find a Lawyer

GULFAM RASHEED versus STATE

The case was presented to the police 8/2 hours after the testimony of section 2 30b (b) of testimony, although the distance between the incident and the police station was two miles out of the four accused in the FLR, one was acquitted by the trial court. done. And two other persons were shown as unknown persons. The motive behind the incident was said to be a previous dispute between the victim and the accused, but neither the date, time nor the place of dispute in the recourse memorial mention. Was done, the crime was revealed that 6 of the 13 Kalashnikovs, 6 of the 222 rifles, 1 of the 8mm rifles, 1 gun of the 12 bore, I left 12 bore cartridges, were captured, But none of Kalashnikov's vacancies or 222, 8mm was stored in the mall. No weapons were recovered from the suspects who were sent to the firearms specialist, there was no help in the prosecution in the circumstances, which was clearly contradicted by the Ocular account and the medical evidence. , It could not be ignored. And the accused could not disclose the name of the complainant police officer who wrote the complainant's request. The complainant also improved the sleeping place of the late and deceased witness, in all investigations, except all the accused, was found innocent. Not only the investigating officers, but also the section P, which was investigated by the police's DIG Crime Arrian, although it was not bound by the court, but the incident took place during the dark hours of the night and it was filed by the FI. There was a case of an R&D post. Two-and-a-half year after the event, immigration advocates email from Mingora lawyer