Find a Lawyer

IMRAN KHALID versus STATE

In section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302, 201, 365 A & 34 bail, the accused with the accused was tried under section 365A on the grant, by the special court the PPC committed terrorist activities. Was established under the Pressure Act 1975 and was sentenced. The special court observed in the judgment of conviction and punishment that a separate challan could be filed against the accused under sections 302, 201 and 34 of the PPC and consequently the same accused was tried. In the challan submitted under Sections 302, 201 and 34 against him, the PPC accused, since the date of his arrest was continuously detained and his detention period under section 302, 201 and 34. The trial is a case, the PPC was almost no possibility for about 14 years. The future of the trial was imminent. The delay could not be blamed for the delay and the accused could not be held for a period of time. Extremely delayed F-14 years at the end of the trial, he will be entitled to the relief sought for the co-defendant, having already been released on bail. And his case was quite similar to the case of his co-accused, in which case he was entitled to bail in accordance with the circumstances. online advocate from Arifwala lawyer