Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus STATE

PPC filed a petition to suspend section 426 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) and 308 plea suspensions / accused, who were sentenced to life imprisonment under section 302 (b). Was At the time of the incident, he is 15 years old, should have been sentenced under section 308, PPC, instead of section 308 (b), which could have imposed a sentence of up to 14 years. And that he has already served a 17/18 year prison sentence, which was raised by the applicant on account of contradictions in the ocular account and others, at the time of the dismissal of a failed appeal report by the failed authorities. This shows that the applicant / accused has already been punished. The substantial portion of his sentence and the unexpected part of his 25 years imprisonment was only 6 years and the decision to appeal in the near future was not expected. Under such aspect, the applicant was entitled to his sentence suspended. In doing so, the accused's sentence was suspended and bail was granted accordingly immigration advocates email from Ranipur lawyer