Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA) THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus MST. SHAMIM AKHTAR

According to the doctor, the prosecution for the removal of the Section 1 victim's legal heritage, which resulted in the electric current flowing from rain water in the Wapda Pole Proof, was such that the electrocution record Electricity hit the road in the rainwater, flowing through a pole standing by Wapda, a family consisting of ten (10) members was being fed, with a monthly allowance of Rs 3,000. He is believed to have lived for 15 years and has earned Rs 3,000. Rs. 5,40,000 per month as damages to the plaintiffs

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2006

• TARIQ HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, VEHARI 2006 CLC 514
• GULFAM RASHEED v. State 2006 YLR 514
• SANAULLAH v. State 2006 PCRLJ 515
• Messrs SARGODHA JUTE MILLS LIMITED through Director v. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR-II, (ADJUDICATION), COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE (ADJU 2006 PTD 515
• GHULAM RASOOL v. ALLAH BAKHSH KHAN, A.S.J., CHINIOT 2006 YLR 519
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. Messrs SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD., LAHORE 2006 PTD 521
• QAMAR ABBAS v. MARKET COMMITTEE, QADIR PUR RAWAN DISTRICT MULTAN 2006 PLC(CS) 521
• Mst. SHEZAN SANAULLAH v. State 2006 PCRLJ 522

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2006 →

list of advocates from Pirpai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes