Find a Lawyer

GUL BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ

Section 122 and 123 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 16 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 suit proof for gift of suit land to the plaintiff's husband as head of the family \ guara allowance \ plaintiff Was allocated for. It was claimed that the plaintiff's husband had gifted her a suit property through Habana, but the plaintiff denied the defendant's allegation, that the plaintiff sought medical treatment with her husband, an elderly man. Had brought her to her old husband. For the purpose of executing G exec, the suit leased / rented in connection with the suit land, but the fraud was obtained by the defendant The plaintiff also alleged that her husband was found to be unfaithful. Went on to allegedly file a stampede with Habenham. The Treasury Office was purchased at `G at 'and on the back of the stamp paper, this Treasury Office affirmation showed that the stamp paper / lease was purchased for Minafor, but the Court of Appeal had brushed aside Ed. Said plaintiff and her husband / alleged donor, material pieces of evidence were elderly couples who were unaccounted for and property by property was their only source of income. The fact that they were the only source of income through gift. Were not appealed for reasons. Because such a gift was against human behavior, the plaintiff provided factual evidence of the disputed case established by the Habanama and was not processed where the suit land was located and the parties were resident, but were executed. Was given and registered elsewhere. Under the strict terms of Section 16 of the Contract Act advocate from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer