Find a Lawyer

AQSA MANZOOR versus UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, LAHORE THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR

Article 199 of the High Court Scope Educational Institution Examination notification has been granted constitutional jurisdiction by the University to improve the quality and quality of medical education; Government policy matters cannot be construed as such Cannot be challenged unless it is proved that in the present case the constitution was formulated against the basic and fundamental provisions of the candidates / applicants, participated in the examination after the implementation / publication of this notification and The examiners' position was that they were not given the knowledge of implementation Oops. Did not have this notification and the same information that was enforced under the law in the same validation, published in the Gazette of the Government or authorized to do so by notification of a notifying agency. Was given. A notification was published and enforced, it became law it was not necessary or necessary for the enforcement authority to notify or inform everyone. According to the law, it is the duty of all persons concerned to be aware of any person who has acted or acted in compliance with the law, rules and regulations. It will not be governed by new laws, rules and regulations. In such a case, the approval and renewal principle will apply. There was no excuse for being ignorant of the law, and the students attended and appeared in the next upcoming exam after the notification of their disapproval. Considering the existence and impact of this notification, it is considered and considered that the object raised by the inspectors cannot be implemented. female advocates from Eminabad lawyer