PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR versus MESSERS SAJID TRADERS THROUGH (CIVIL PROPRIETOR)
Article 10 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Art 72, 74, 76, 85, 92, 117 and 118 cannot be verbally approved by the Contractor for official construction work, therefore, so on. Was, to demand the filing of such documentary evidence for the withdrawal of the plaintiff, such as advertisement for inviting tenders, approval of the contract execution agreement and the work order issued by the government in his order in the submission of such documents. Failure that should have had a natural occurrence. Failure by the plaintiff to seek the relevant record of the plaintiff or to include secondary evidence and to seek permission to withhold the best evidence, the plaintiff's version may produce negative thinking against the Measuring Book, which is never signed and verified by the competent authority. Used to be At the same time, wrongful detention was found which created the impression that it was a false and fabricated document and could not be considered as a documentary document that the plaintiff appeared in court with unclean hands and no other No work was done except that, it was not assigned by the witnesses' evidence by the government but the courts did not uphold the decision to the extent of the claim admitted under it. The High Court set aside the rest of the claim. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Tank lawyer
