Find a Lawyer

MRS. KHALIDA MALIK versus TAHIRA JABEEN

In the cases of Articles 8 and 42, the plaintiff alleged in his claim that the defendant made a general authority lawyer on his behalf, registered him, and on the basis of which he had disputed the plaintiff's company in favor of the plaintiff. Moved a piece of. At the time of the execution and during the confirmation of the General Power of Attorney allegedly in favor of the defendant, it was trivial, and that he neither appeared before the sub-registrar nor executed the power by the defendants. The off-attorney suit was contended that it was claimed that the plaintiff was not the only one at the time. Executed and verified the registered Power of Attorney, but at the same time withdrew from his conduct to bring the case because the alleged lawyer was his original grandfather, who, on behalf of the plaintiff in the course of the trial. Was action from. The prosecutor ordered the litigation, without any good reason, that the plaintiff was the real grandfather of the plaintiff D failed to support the allegations of failure to appear before the court and also examined The cross-cross inspector plaintiff / vendor company admits that the plaintiff's lawyer had no knowledge of the weakness that he would take on his behalf to sell the property on his behalf. best law firms from Fateh Pur lawyer