Find a Lawyer

AUQAF DEPARTMENT versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ

Sections 3 (3) and 9 (2) of the West Pakistan Waqf Properties (Administration) Rules, 1960, R7 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 14 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 8, 42 and 55 of the Suit Off The limitation of the ban on the declaration and the discovery of the two courts below was that as the tenant could be given his / her tenancy under section 9 without giving any notice of it or giving him an opportunity to be heard and without any section 9. Approved the lease cancellation order, was properly dismissed from the case. The Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance, 1979, Act of Department, had no legal jurisdiction nor had any legal effect and the tenant was entitled to re-establish his tenancy primaries, finding the two courts below this limit No typing or reading was encountered. Evidence, especially when nothing was presented by the Department showing that the tenant's leasehold rights were terminated after giving him notice as well as giving him a chance to be heard, But since then the tenant has been silent about the matter for three years and has never been agitated with the eviction proceedings three years after the property was disposed of in the dispute and such silence by the tenant. And it was enough for the non-interference that he had accepted his eviction proceedings. And after that the other person had justified the delivery of the property to the suit and it is enough that the tenant handed over his tenancy rights to the appellate court, which in his judgment rejected the tenant. And the suit violates the suit property divorce advocates from Phool nagar lawyer