Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI WARRAICH versus PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD

Section 2 (b), 9 (a) (ii), (IV) and (v), 18 (g) and 31st Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The Court of Accountability against the applicant in respect of constitutional application Was accused of. That he had opened an account with a sum of Rs. 1000 only in SCCL, but without having to submit any document for this purpose, he got financing of Rs. 1,42,82,341. The petitioner said that the money was never paid and that the applicant was the first person to commit the misuse of the amount mentioned under Section 9 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. The applicant was of the view that in case of willful default, the reference can be filed only after obtaining permission from the State Bank of Pakistan as the defamatory corporation was not operating by the State Bank and it has not been operated by the State Bank of Pakistan. We did not deal with the applicant without the permission of the State Bank of Pakistan where there was no concern. There was no need to present a case under Section 31D of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, unless the question of maintaining the reference filed against the applicant was finally resolved in a writ petition, under which The applicant had filed a probation court against his dismissal. In section 6565K, the CRPC filed a petition that the PCP claimed that it was entitled to a refund if the forced conditions were barred by it, and the petitioner himself filed the petition. The transaction was submitted and stated that the application has been processed as per the request. National Accountability Pakistan, top advocate family court from Chaman lawyer