Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMAD versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Validation of Evidence After being accused of Redemption Reduction, he did not choose to challenge his conviction, but merely requested reduction of the sentence because in any case the accused Nothing was on record to indicate the previous conviction. The same nature was alleged to have led to his imprisonment for six years until 2000, when, in view of the quantity allegedly recovered from the possession of the accused, Section 9 (c) of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997 ) Was not attracted to Proviso, the High Court reduced the sentence to 14 years imprisonment with a rigorous imprisonment sentence of five years \ rigorous imprisonment, accordingly \ r \ n \ r \ n best law firm from Killa Saifullah lawyer