Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY COLONIES/MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVEN

Section 7 and 10 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), 5 164 West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XL of 1957), Section 8 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Further cancellation of allotment of scheme scheme in the So Moto dispute. I was given the power to review the Member Board of Revenue Land under the Gore Moor Food Scheme and the applicants seized the said land, but in the favor of the applicants the allotment order, later the Member Board of Revenue. Withdrew using the auto option. Review the order of the allotment, reviewed on three scores by unknown order. First, the disputed property was already referred to the Punjab Privatization Board. Secondly, the governor had already rejected the allotment. And third, that the applicants had concealed the Punjab Privatization Board through auction for fraud and material fact regarding the said property for sale, in their report submitted to the High Court, clearly stated that under The land was never referenced. There was no other evidence available for sale through the open auction that any reference was made to the Member Board of Revenue of the Punjab Privatization Board; the Governor dismissed the applicant's claim without any substance or evidence under the circumstances. It was a fact that the summary sent to the governor was not formally approved. The summary was also silent that no other land of the same quality was available in the district concerned for allotment of the applicants as per the orders of the High Court. Was. For example, about fraud and misrepresentation lawer from fb area from Charsada lawyer