ROOHI BANO versus S.H.O.
Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR petitioner's constitutional plea was argued that he himself was making a voluntary marriage contract with the accused in the court, he did not complain ? , Could be locked up in the hallway for a few days, but he refused to apply in the hallway that his father / complainant divorced his mother 10 years ago, and also that his father / Had tortured her. The complainant petitioner had claimed adulthood and had contracted the marriage with the Standing Medical Board of Hospital co-accused's report, revealing that the applicant was about 15-15/16 years old in which the applicant The prosecutor's story was denied, showing that he did not love. Her father, who divorced long before her mother, indicated that the applicant had entered into a marriage contract with the accused at will and with Walito, and that he had not committed any crime under the FIR. Was undone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Nowshera Cantt lawyer