Find a Lawyer

NUSRAT ALI versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, TEHSIL CHINIOT, DISTRICT JHANG

Article 5, Schedule and 8, 9 and 11 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), a case of constitutional petition for the recovery of articles of Article 199, Defendant, who was served by reference in the paper, in appearing in court. Failed, action taken against. The former Court of Appeals appeared before the Family Court and moved a petition to set aside the former party order, which was ordered to pay the costs, separated the order and adjourned to file a written statement. Failed to appear in the postponement date due to his illness before the Family Court, but his lawyer tried to file a written statement without paying the expenses, to pay for the costs due on a later date. Defendant's lawyer's request was rejected and his defense was dismissed, no doubt Yes, the stay order was subject to payment of the costs for the defendant's previous proceedings, but the Family Court nevertheless hastened to stop defendant's defense, saying that he would pay costs at the next hearing. His lawyer was ready with a written statement for the defendant to file a lawyer's request. He was wrongly rejected by the Family Court, although the defendants are ill and in his absence he had a lawyer. Not in a position to pay honorarium and assured that he could be paid at a later date of hearing, the defendant's lawyer's statement should have been believed and the defendant's written statement From the purpose for which the case was settled, the payment parties jobs for fresh advocates from Chicha watni lawyer