Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL THROUGH L.RS versus SAADULLAH KHAN

The fact of the section title 42 is that the plaintiff alleges the sale of his mother-owned land by the lower courts and tried to terminate the sale mutations in favor of the defendants on the basis of fraud. The trial court and the appellate court, respectively, dismissed the case, and the superior appellate court, together with the jurisdictional jurisdiction, set aside the facts found by the courts, and the plaintiff's claims of authenticity. And referred the case to the plaintiff's role as Revenue Officer in the area, The light is in need of deep and careful testing. The High Court's observations and the facts recorded by the appellate court cannot be ruled out without any reasoning which was reached by the claim of the High Court. In the isolation but with the whole of the evidence that had to be examined together with the evidence to which it ultimately participated, its image could be widely screened in the original context for as long as and until it was fixed. No matter how much land sold by the plaintiff's mother, the dispute cannot be sustained as the High Court did not investigate to avoid proceeding to shorten the litigation and complete justice. , A small relief can be given as the courts did below the verdict and the order passed by the High Court Was placed and the case was referred to the High Court for a review request. Allowed best advocate from Daska lawyer