MUHAMMAD ASLAM JAVED versus UNITED BANK LTD. THROUGH CIRCLE EXECUTIVE
Section 48A Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of XX6969), Appeal of Section 25A Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A & 6 Delays Appeal Before Invalid Forum, Labor Court Employed by Bank Court The judgment was restored, the appeal filed before the Labor Appellate Tribunal but at the termination of the tribunal, the appeal was transferred to the High Court, which was raised by the employee in favor of the bank in 2005. In the appeal case before the High Court, The Tribunals Act was enacted in 1973, and only the service tribunal has the jurisdiction to hear appeals, so that all appeals remain valid before other forums. The precision treatment provided to the parties was offered under Section 6 (2) of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, allowing the relevant party a period of 90 days. Before filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal of the service, within 90 days the jurisdiction of the service tribunal was not requested and even then the High Court decided the appeal as never existed before and Which led to its termination a long time ago, for no reason was considered pending before the High Court. The High Court had neither the jurisdiction to decide the matter nor the matter pending before the Supreme Court. Appeal for leave to appeal and appeal to the High Court of Appeals was r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Jatoi lawyer