Find a Lawyer

MST. MAQSOOD MAI versus ABDUL RASHID

On the basis of Section 21 and 30 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 10 pre-emption suit boundary sale transfer agreement, the seller's contract to sell the incomplete title of the seller was executed and transferred to the seller. Was. In 1980, in 1981, in favor of the shopkeeper in compliance with a civil court-approved decree for the specific performance of a pre-emptor sale agreement, which was dismissed by the trial court because ownership had already been transferred from the register. The Appeal Court for sale passed the decision and the decision by the trial court, but the High Court did not restore the trial court's decision to sell the trial court's valid use of the amended jurisdiction, and for that reason, any ownership, if any, Of course, the transfer of occupancy under the sale cannot be considered and the potential pre-emptor supply cannot be expected to follow. Subject to payment and, most importantly, the sales certificate from the seller. , Because he acquired the property from the government. Through the auction, the vendor had not yet consolidated its title and the contract was to be completed after the acquisition of the title and the sale could never be completed through a registered document and if any ownership was still not considered under the sale decision The court was set aside and the appeal was allowed to be restored by the Court of Appeal. tax advocates from Chitral lawyer