Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL AHMAD versus PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL

Article 129 (g) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Dismissal of the available evidence Assuming the official employee the final result of the fact through a forum below acknowledged his responsibility to harm the government in a letter Of such employees were dismissed from the service The penal services imposed by the service tribunal were retained. The civil servant did not attach a copy of the letter in which he accepted the written obligation. It was sufficient that the contents of the letter regarding the entry of civil servant were considered correct and the law against it could not be allowed under the provisions of this testimony. It may be deduced, the 1984 Inquiry Officer found the public employee guilty after proper appreciation of the record, which was later approved by all forums that did not require him to act. The court's appeal for the re-evaluation of the evidence listed by the inquiry officer's charges against the civil servant was supported by the evidence provided by the judges appointed by the service tribunal, according to the Supreme Court's decree that public servants Also failed to identify evidence whereby the Supreme Court could convince the court that all the services rendered by the service tribunals were disallowed, unlawful, or the authorities' current actions and service against the record The tribunal's decision was considered unconstitutional because of the law of public importance in this case There was no question involved best law firm from Jauharabad lawyer