HAFEEZ ALIAS HAFEEZA versus STATE
The evidence of the prosecution against the three accused in the Section 12 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Evidence, was the same and on the same basis, but the evidence of the victim and the complainant was not to be believed. Minor stains were also found in the two alleged malpractices of the victim, but the sending of the chemical to the Examiner was not explained in the same way, the version presented by the victim was not supported by medical evidence. Was done Prior to the incident taken by the accused, there was a conflict between the parties and the possibility of his being trapped could not be ruled out in this case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer
