Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMEER versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the two versions was the case of the accused was that he had learned about the immoral act of molestation with his daughter and because of this the passion The temperature was high. Evidence fired at the victim under the tomb and sudden provocation is not recorded on the record that the accused, at any time, saw his daughter and the deceased at any place at all, if the version of the accused gave full weight to it. Even if there is an element of the tomb and the outrage will suddenly disappear and it can hardly be suggested that the accused was incited when he was notified of the act of the deceased and instead of setting the law machinery against the victim, Took it in your hand The excuse for a crime and sudden outrage due to surrounded or family honor should be separated from the grave and sudden outrage, resulting in the grave and minor offense. jw.org en The outrage would not be available to the defendant who pleaded for circumspection and family dishonesty, and to accompany the accused with the intent to avenge the victim's immoral act on charges of inciting her child's humble behavior. Had committed the crime. The offense, armed with a gun, went to the scene of the incident and fired repeatedly at the defendant's deadly action; therefore, the provisions of section 2302 (c), PPC, were not covered, in which case he was attracted. can go. Under Section 2302 (a) and (b), the essential components of the murder were punishable; the PPC was missing. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Bhirya Road lawyer