COL. SHAH SADIQ versus MUHAMMAD ASHIQ
Article 199 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 173, 265 K, 249 A, 551, 561 A, 190 and 63 of the Police Rules, 1934, R 24 7 Concepts (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468 and 471. The FIR must have the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court jurisdiction, if, in the first offense, a crime was committed, the Supreme Court, while staying within the jurisdictional jurisdiction of the High Court, neglected the ordinary trial. The High Court had no jurisdiction to reject the FIR. Providing an opportunity for scrutiny without contradicting the documents produced by Parliament or contradicting those documents which would be a mistake under the normal procedure of the High Court under the law, such as under the Criminal Code of Conduct, 1898 There was an alternative to the party wishing to abolish the IR. How to raise an objection at the time of the trial by the trial court against them or the final disposal of the trial after recording the evidence, trial under section 265A and 249A, CCPC Refer to the relevant magistrate for treatment before treatment or for termination of the case under the provisions of the alternative treatment of PCs available under party-registered principles.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer