Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) that occurred in broad daylight in the street near the residence of the parties, the presence of witnesses at the incident was quite natural and without a doubt the eyes. The testimony of the defendant was true and unforgivable, encouraging any hostility or malicious trust against the testimony of the Ocular and was supported by healthy medical evidence in which the defendant made his own version of the incident. It was not acknowledged that there was a remote possibility of such an incident. According to the evidence, the accused had fired on the most sensitive part of the victim's body in connection with the aggression of the acquitted suspect, which proved to be a fatal murder, thus, it was neither accidental, nor a sudden incident The matter should be brought to court. In section 302 (c), the leave provisions for the PPC appeal were denied under the circumstances. law firms from Gaggo Mandi lawyer