Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE


Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) that occurred in broad daylight in the street near the residence of the parties, the presence of witnesses at the incident was quite natural and without a doubt the eyes. The testimony of the defendant was true and unforgivable, encouraging any hostility or malicious trust against the testimony of the Ocular and was supported by healthy medical evidence in which the defendant made his own version of the incident. It was not acknowledged that there was a remote possibility of such an incident. According to the evidence, the accused had fired on the most sensitive part of the victim's body in connection with the aggression of the acquitted suspect, which proved to be a fatal murder, thus, it was neither accidental, nor a sudden incident The matter should be brought to court. In section 302 (c), the leave provisions for the PPC appeal were denied under the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Noor kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.