COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENT (LABOUR UNION) THROUGH GENERAL SECRETARY versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, HOUSING AND TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Constitutional disputes in Articles 199 and 204, regardless of whether the applicant's dues are paid or not, cannot be decided by the contempt of court petition, as it raises controversial questions as to why applicants on one hand The lawyer insisted there were no liabilities. Paid in accordance with the law, the authority's lawyer (defendant) stated that this had happened, that the petition of the contempt court was directed to the applicants to take any other legal action available to them to resolve their complaint. Resort to \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
