GUL MUHAMMAD HAJANO versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, SINDH
Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) Sindh Local Government Ordinance (XXVII of 2001), section 18 (ii) in the writ petition of Coto Warrant, relying on section 18, question of City Nazim's Adviser An appointment was called. (ii) the Sindh Local Government Ordinance 2001, which explicitly stipulated that the District Nazim would not employ any Advisor, Special Assistant or Political Secretary to the Council of City Nazim. That no such appointment can be made by the moderator. That no appointment of any kind was made and no official responsibility was given by the City Government on the alleged advisor, in which case any position in the Advisory City District Government must be appointed. Was not done, nor was he. Entitled to exercise any duty as an advisor or otherwise the constitutional request is dealt with accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer