FAISAL IKRAM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI
Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for Intervention of Tenants Withdrawal of Lease Contract Applicant (Tenant) The trial court ruled that the lease agreement had expired under the lease agreement between the parties. And unilateral renewal has been made. The lease was not valid under the said lease agreement. The applicant (the tenant) stated that under the lease agreement, the lease was renewable at the discretion of the applicant (the tenant) by which his option was exercised. According to the lease agreement, the first renewal could be applied only with the mutual consent of the parties, but the second period was renewable at the discretion of the applicant (tenant); a dispute arose between the parties on behalf of the lease agreement, which was an approved agreement between the parties. The document was. The use of the terminology in the relevant clause of the lease agreement made it clear that the first and second renewals were in the applicant's (tenant) jurisdiction, and that the lease agreement could be reasonably estimated as five years. The renewal was for a longer period and then the tenancy would be renewed for a longer period. The option of the applicant (the tenant) was granted to the applicant (the tenant) to renew the tenancy on the same terms and conditions, and the use of the terminology term instead of the relevant clause is expressly made was done. If the above lease agreement was intended by the parties to be limited to the second renewal only, the terms of the lease agreement were not used in the relevant clause. In the relevant clause, it is revealed that both renewals qualify for
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
